Country Club Membership

You are currently browsing the archive for the Country Club Membership category.


As reported in the New York Post:

“Sheri Astrachan slapped her estranged real-estate-exec hubby, Matthew, with a $20 million defamation suit after he allegedly cut off her access to the tony Old Westbury Golf & Country Club and various credit cards.The move triggered a golf-club rule that Sheri’s name — and even the amount of her debt — be listed in its public places, including in its men’s and women’s locker rooms, “proclaiming for all to see that she had not paid her bills to the club,” says the spurned wife’s Manhattan Supreme Court suit.”

The full story can be found here.

By: Rob Harris

Two Richmond, Virginia area country clubs–Meadowbrook and Lake Chesdin–merged in early 2013. Now, with the ink on the pre-nup barely dry, they have announced the end to their marriage.

According to a published report, the disagreement that pushed the two toward their divorce was Lake Chesdin’s unhappiness at the fees that Meadowbrook was charging for providing Lake Chesdin with accounting services.

So, the two clubs, each reportedly unprofitable, separately head back to the inhospitable club environment.

I’m unaware of this issue being litigated in the United States, but here’s an interesting case, as reported in The Asahi Shimbun:

HAMAMATSU–A transgender woman has won a lawsuit against the operators of a golf course who denied her membership after she changed her registered sex from male to female.

The Shizuoka District Court’s Hamamatsu branch on Sept. 8 ordered the golf course operators to pay 1.1 million yen ($10,380) in damages. The plaintiff, a 59-year-old company owner in Shizuoka Prefecture, had demanded 5.85 million yen in compensation.

Presiding Judge Kenjiro Furuya ruled that it was unlawful to reject membership on the grounds of a sex change and acknowledged the action caused mental suffering to the plaintiff.

“The act denied the very basis of the plaintiff’s personality, although she has established her sexual identity both physically and socially,” Furuya said.

He concluded the operators’ action was “illegal as it went beyond socially acceptable limits.”

People are born with their gender identity, so the rejection of the membership runs counter to the spirit of Article 14 of the Constitution that guarantees legal equality for all, the judge added.

The golf course operators defended their move, arguing that club members may feel uncomfortable and confused about sharing a bathroom and changing room with the woman.

Lawyers for the defendants said the operators “decided to refuse her membership without malice but out of concern for the potential negative effects on their business after hearing the opinions of club members.”

They added that they will decide on whether to appeal after thoroughly reading the content of the ruling.

By: Rob Harris

Attention casual readers: This entry may be destined for the “Best Of Golf Dispute Resolution”:

Free on $250,000 bail, Dr. James Simon has been charged with attempted manslaughter and assault with a firearm, after shooting William Osenton twice in the abdomen.

Here’s how a local news source described the incident:

“The shooting occurred July 17 on the 5100 block of Paradise Drive near Robin Drive. Police said both men were driving on Paradise Drive when a traffic conflict broke out.

“Police said Simon pulled into his driveway off Paradise Drive and into his garage, with Osenton trailing behind him. As the garage door closed, it struck Osenton’s Mercedes.

“Simon allegedly retrieved a .357-caliber revolver, fired one warning shot into the hillside across from his home, then shot Osenton two times in the abdomen.

“Police subsequently seized 50 guns, 200 boxes of ammunition and numerous magazines from Simon’s home. The items remain in police custody, as does Osenton’s car, which is being held pending examination by the defense.”

So, what does this unseemly example of road rage have to do with golf?

Apparently, Mr. Osenton is a golfer and is a member of the Meadow Club, described in the aforementioned news report as “Marin County’s most exclusive golf club.”

According to Dr. Simon’s defense attorney, Mr. Osenton is reputed to have quite a temper, which he believes he has displayed at the Meadow Club. Apparently seeking to bolster a claim that Dr. Simon acted in self-defense when he shot Mr. Osenton, defense counsel sought to require the club to produce records regarding Mr. Osenton:

“Seeking to discredit Osenton, Simon’s defense attorney subpoenaed Osenton’s records at the Meadow Club… The defense attorney, Charles Dresow, said he had information that Osenton, a 69-year-old Tiburon resident, has a history of aggressively confronting other members and damaging club property in ‘fits of rage.’”

The club objected, the judge reviewed the records privately, and determined they contained nothing relevant.

However, according to GHIN, Mr. Osenton, carrying a 10.7 handicap index, indeed may have been injured fairly seriously. He has entered no scores since July.

By: Rob Harris

I’m not sure if Waccabuc Country Club has a waiting list. If so, it’s likely one person shorter.

Local news reports that, “authorities say Bronxville (NY) lawyer Timothy Griffin lived large — and stole over $1 million from his clients to help pay for it.”

“According to the state Attorney General’s Office, between April 2009 and February 2014, he stashed the cash in his personal bank account and used it to pay for a membership at the Waccabuc Country Club, a BMW, a Lexus, expensive jewelry and other personal items.”


By: Rob Harris

There is a fascinating article about the legal dispute between Westchester’s famed Quaker Ridge Golf Club and neighbor who is upset about the golf balls ending up on his property. The dispute–about which we first commented three months agohas resulted in the entry of a preliminary injunction requiring the club to prevent the golf ball onslaught. The club has attempted to comply by installing netting and by moving the second tee 115 yards forward.

This week, an appellate panel refused to grant the club’s motion for reargument. Next steps–the case will return to the trial court for consideration of damages issues. Only then, will the club be able to take a full appeal of all issues.

Meanwhile, according to online local news outlet Lohud, the case is creating concerns among courses throughout metropolitan New York and beyond. What makes the Quaker Ridge case particularly troublesome is that the homeowner built and moved into his home almost ninety years after the course was established. Nonetheless, the courts to date have found in favor of the newcomer, finding that it’s the club’s responsiblity to take action to prevent the golf ball incursion.

The distinct possibility that the club will need to permanently redesign the A.W. Tillinghast course to accommodate the neighbor strikes some as highly inappropriate. As the article quotes one:

“Quaker Ridge is one of Tillinghast’s most famous designs,” said Bob Trebus, a member of Baltusrol Golf Club in New Jersey and president of The Tillinghast Association. “It would be a shame to alter his design. … That’s like painting a mustache on the Mona Lisa.”

By: Rob Harris

You have to love the cash management strategy followed by Harris Golf Co., which owns or manages ten golf courses in Maine.

Claiming that it is protesting abusively high tax assessments on its courses, Harris Golf has adopted a corporate policy of permitting tax liens to be filed on its courses, and paying the overdue taxes before the expiration of the 18 month period the government must wait before it can foreclose.

According to Harris Golf’s president, “We believe that we’re being overcharged. If you look back at the history since we bought it, it’s a pattern. We always pay the taxes before the liens mature. For us, it’s the normal course of action. It’s how we run our business.”

Choosing to vote with its wallet, president Jeff Harris proclaims: “That is the only way we can get a vote — by dollars — holding them back. It is what it is, and the only thing you can do [to object] is withhold the money. It’s a very sore subject for me because we feel like we’re being abused.”


‘When you dish out illegal stock tips at the golf course, there are no mulligans.”

So begins the interesting and informative article by Patrick Temple-West in Politico discussing two insider trading cases recently brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission “that center on the relationships between golfing buddies and how their chitchat in the tee box or at the 19th hole turned into lucrative and illegal trading bonanzas.”

According to a former official in the SEC’s enforcement division, quoted by Temple-Best, “[g]olf is becoming a recurring theme in insider trading cases.”

Golf Dispute Resolution’s posts about the two cases discussed by Temple-West can be found here and here.

By: Rob Harris

Although sometimes attributed to Abraham Lincoln, others question the origin of the proverb: “He who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client.” My vote for likely candidate is an attorney marketing trade group.

Whatever its origins, the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court recently provided at least temporary relief to a member of The Ridge at Back Brook who initially undertook to represent himself in court proceedings challenging his obligation to pay dues and associated country club costs totaling approximately $87,000, which liability, with finance charges, had by the time of judgment grown to more than $250,000.

The member’s substantive defense apparently was that his dues “were improperly utilized for capital and debt service, contrary to the terms of the membership agreement, which provided it was to be utilized, if at all, exclusively for operational expenses” As the court explained, “Defendant asserted that plaintiff took this course because ;the project was millions of dollars over budget’ even though plaintiff ‘affirmatively advised’ at the contract’s formation that ‘there was no debt and construction was within budget.’”

The trial court, however, refused to entertain the member’s arguments, finding that he failed to present them timely and in accordance with the court’s rules and procedures.

The appellate court, however, showed some empathy. As its opinion states:

We … hold that a pro se litigant is entitled to nothing less than that to which a litigant is entitled when represented by a negligent attorney. That is, … pro se litigants are not entitled to greater rights than litigants who are represented by counsel. But we also [have] recognized…– in concluding that a self-represented litigant was deprived of a meaningful opportunity to be heard due to a lack of understanding of motion practice – that it is ”fundamental that the court system . . . protect the procedural rights of all litigants and to accord procedural due process to all litigants.”

Consequently, the appellate court sent the case back “for further consideration of defendant’s motion to be relieved of the consequences of his failure to adequately represent himself.”



By: Rob Harris

As if changing demographics and an economic downturn weren’t obstacles enough. Now, country clubs are facing targeting by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Last month, we noted that the SEC had charged seven golf buddies with insider trading.

Now, the federal government has announced that civil and criminal charges have been brought against the senior vice president of a bank for tipping off a “fellow golfer with whom he socialized at a local country club” about his employer’s plans to acquire another banking institution. The tippee–charged civilly by the SEC, but not criminally–allegedly parlayed the inside information into a $300,000 profit.

For those who view the government’s golf-related actions as aberrations, wrong. The official press release issued by the SEC provides as follows:

“Country clubs or similar venues may give people a false sense of security that leads them to think they can get away with trading on unlawful stock tips,” said Paul G. Levenson, director of the SEC’s Boston Regional Office. “But as in any social setting, people who trade securities based on confidential information they receive are taking a huge risk that their illegal tipping and trading will be identified by the SEC.”

Those who always had an urge to read an SEC insider trading complaint now have their opportunity to do so.

Thanks to Bob Carlson, lawschool friend and author of the Retirement Watch financial newsletter, for alerting me to this hot-off-the-press item.

« Older entries